Yesterday, somebody
asked me whether humour can be taught. Out of impulse, i replied in
the negative, later explaining that humour is something one acquires
over time. I'm yet to come across a kid who is REALLY funny. Neither
have i heard of a baby who made his ma laugh through labour. I'm sure
there are certain principles in humour that the likes of Pryor,
Carlin, Seinfeld, Berra and Barry must have touched upon but to me,
the idea that it can be taught by ABC to XYZ is quite pedantic. How
long before the person who is learning from a master realizes that he
is only becoming a clone of his master? I say this because the
funniest people you know don't sit in an empty room writing jokes
after jokes, hoping they click with the public. That job is of a
stand-up comedian. Not for people like you and me, for whom the whole
world's not a stage. The funniest people you know do things
organically, don't they? They may read a lot, yes. They may observe a
lot too. They may know a lot as well. They just don't have to put
their jokes into a structure. They just deliver when the time is
right and to an audience they know is going to get their minds blown.
A joke, for lack of better words, is basically bullshit that helps
kill time in style. And we don't really need jokers for that.
Anything can click and anything can fail. After all, humour is a
chance-based event. Let's keep it that way.
No comments:
Post a Comment